So.both are good sceneries, but the FT version is worth every penny (as is the case with all of their sceneries). ![]() I'd say try 9D and if that works for you then spring for the FT version. There are no blurries and the performance is great. The big difference is that 9D buildings in downtown HK seem 'generic' while the FT buildings seem right out of a picture. It features the entire city with thousands of custom buildings, detailed checkerboard approach and more. This version has been fully recompiled to support Prepar3D v4. If you won’t be flying into Kai-Tak itself but wish to use Hong Kong as a city scenery, you should also install this mode. If you run FSX’s DirectX-10 Preview you must select the SDK-Compliance Option for the scenery to display properly at night. Keep in mind that we wan't to fly airliner jets to it and also pay attention to my systemAMD 64 4000+ OC 2.6 GHz2 Gb PC3200 RAMNVIDIA 7950GT 512M DDR3 AGPWD Raptor 150 GbWin XP HomeI've tried both 9D and FT and FT wins hands down in the level of detail of the buildings and airport.the FT version is as real as it gets short of flying to Hong Kong and illegally flying the approach in real life. Just released by FlyTampa is version 2.0 of Hong Kong Kai Tak. SDK mode and features brighter runway lighting. ![]() So how does it look in FS9 and even more important how is the performence? I have a fear that it might be useless because of blurries. I have seen a review of it but that was for FSX also i think the screenshots are from FSX. I would like to know more about this scenery and how to expect explicitily in FS9 (in FSX it's a lost case for me).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |